
I was talking with a professed Christian a couple of weeks ago, and the topic of abortion came up.
Stating the argument.
The professed Christian proceeded to make the argument, that we should not be taking away people’s freedom to make their own personal choices when it comes to abortion. What he was saying is that, human beings should be free to make the choices they want to, specifically the choice of a mother to abort a child if, for any reason, she felt that abortion was the best choice for her.
He then proceeded to ground the argument in the scriptures, saying, “human choice is found throughout the scriptures, therefore, the women’s choice to abort her child should not be taken away”.
After the conversation was finished, I walked away frustrated and I couldn’t figure out why.
After giving it some serious thought, I figured out why the conversation was so frustrating to me. It was frustrating precisely because the person was a professed believer but sounded nothing like a Christian regarding abortion.
The argument he gave (and incorrectly grounded in the bible), could have been spoken by a non-believer just as well.
Non-believers ground the right for women to kill their children in their wombs (which is what abortion is), in the right to autonomy of their bodily choices. The argument is “my body, my choice”, and basically the argument that this professed Christian made was a different version of that same argument.
His argument was that choice must never be denied or curtailed, rather it must be respected and upheld. People are and must be free to do what they believe is best for them.
If you open one door, you must open all the doors.
But once this argument, which enshrines human choice as something that must never be violated is stated, the one who proposes it has opened a door that can’t be shut.
By this argument ALL the doors of human choice are open and there is no standard by which to close any of them.
By this argument, there is nothing to stop all the doors of human choice to be opened and remain open because human choice must be respected.
If human choice must be respected and must not be denied in the case of a women being able to kill her child at any point, then the same must be true of say, the slave owner in the antebellum south. The slaveowner’s choice to hunt, round up, traffic, brutalize, rape and murder other human beings based on their skin color must be respected at all costs. It must not be denied, according to this professed Christian. That door must be kept open, because to deny the slave owner that right, would be to remove his autonomous choice to own, brutalize and to treat human beings as property.
By what standard would or should someone stop him from doing so, if human choice should not be violated? Says who or what?
Likewise, the choice for homosexuals to be married to each other in society (so called same -sex marriage) must be allowed in society based on choice, because to deny it, would be to infringe on a personal choice. But not simply homosexuality, ALL kinds of sexuality and tastes must be respected based on human choice.
This would include polyamorous relationships involving several people, bestiality which is sex with animals and pedophilia just to name a few. If what this professed Christian is saying is true, then “my body, my choice” must be respected and protected everywhere. Another way to put it would be, by what standard should only same-sex marriage be legal? Why couldn’t multiple people being married (polygamy) or say Man-boy/girl relationship, where grown men would marry boys and girls who were underage be allowed? It is their choice, why shouldn’t they be allowed to? By what standard shouldn’t this be allowed?
In the same way, the same must be said of transgenderism. Parents must give their children the choice to take drugs that will stop their bodies from the natural progression of puberty in the name of their personal choice to be whatever gender they decide and at whatever age they decide it. It is there choice. To deny it would be to deny them the autonomy to choose whatever path they want in life, even if it means chemical castration, the inability to have children and the mutilation of their bodies. The door to these atrocities must be left open on the basis of human choice. No matter how evil the choice is, choice must be respected and never prohibited.
Coming back to abortion, on the logic of this professed Christian, why shouldn’t women be able to abort a child at any point of her pregnancy? It is her choice isn’t it? (this is exactly what some advocates for abortion argue in advocating for late term abortions all the way up to the point of birth).
And why not all the way up to birth and even after birth? If it is the women’s choice and the women’s choice must be respected, then if she decides, for whatever reason, that she does not have the means to take of the child or for ANY reason she deems sufficient, then she must have the right to end the child’s life at any stage.
Now the professed Christian might say, “Well, “my body my choice” can only be true and respected if it does not hurt anyone“. The glaring obvious truth is that every abortion is the intentional murder of a defenseless baby in the womb of a mother, (which would be hurting someone).
The position of the Christian who would espouse the “my body, my choice” argument, does not realize that they are opening all the doors to anything and everything that humans choose to do while at the same time, and imposing a universal standard that precludes any door from being closed.
The society that would be produced in following what this professed Christian was espousing, has resulted in the one we live in currently.
Since the 1973 landmark decision in Roe VS Wade, which gave a woman the right to choose to have an abortion based on the right to privacy contained in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, has resulted in 50 million abortions. It has resulted in human choice being elevated above human life.
The fruit, not the root.
But abortion is not the root problem, but rather the fruit of the problem. We live in a society which is rife with abortion, because we are steeped in a society that is drowning in sexual immorality coupled with a rejection of accountability to God and others. The truth of this statement is easily tested by asking one simple questions:
Has our society begun to identify itself more by our sexual identities or has it become more sexually responsible and given more value to sex so that we approach it cautiously with Godly reverence?
The answer is obviously the former. Our culture of killing children is a direct result of our giving God the middle finger and desiring autonomy from Him regarding sex (and everything else).
God has handed us over to the society and world we crave: One that is autonomous from Him (Rom. 1). The result is a society in which we are increasingly identifying ourselves by our perverse sexual identities and by our right to kill children in the wombs of mothers.
Abortion is lauded in the streets, women (and men, but mainly women) march loud and proud through the streets of the United States (and the entire world) demanding, heralding and parading their right to abort their own children!
What this professing Christian is arguing lends more support to the current society we have of rampant sexual immorality without accountability, more children being murdered in the wombs of mothers and more autonomy from God. What they are arguing for is satanic evil in the name of human choice.
By the logic and philosophy of the professed Christian that I was talking to, there is no standard to close any moral door. According to what he was saying, we must respect the choices of all people, including people like Stalin, Mussolini, Pol Pot, Idi Amin and others whose cruelty and sick evil destruction of people was unparalleled. If autonomous choice is to be exalted to a place that it must be respected and protected at all costs and not denied, then it takes the place of human value.
This is morally self-defeating unless this professed Christian would say that human life is more valuable than human choice. If he were to say that, then he would agree that the right to abort a child should not be given to women, because a child’s life in the womb is more valuable then the mother’s right to end that child’s life. The women does not have the right to murder a child in her womb because it would violate our most basic right as human beings: The right and choice to live.
My nine year-old daughter gets this.
The clear and glaring point which must intrude on the “my body, my choice” argument, is some choices are much worse than others and it isn’t your body.
My nine-year-old Christian daughter gets this and can explain it. I do not say this as an insult to the professed Christian who put forward the argument grounded in choice. I simply bring this up, to show that the truth and logic I am putting forward is not complicated and it is plain to a child.
The choice to kill children in the womb is a terrible evil that must be stopped and the child growing in the mother’s womb IS NOT the mother’s body, though it is dependent on her body. If both are true, then a woman’s choice to kill her child should not be respected, but rather should be prosecuted as murder (just like it is prosecuted when a mother and her unborn child is actually murdered; For example, in the Laci Peterson case, where Scott Peterson was charged with two counts of murder).
Where the conversation on abortion must start.
The conversation about abortion does not start with the supremacy of human autonomy and human choice, because that is not where scriptures starts with anything. EVERYTHING starts with God, because that is where scriptures starts, “In the beginning God…”. (Genesis 1.:1)
God, His glory, His purposes, His value, and ultimately His image in man is where the conversation on abortion does start, whether you are a man or woman. Whether or not a woman should have the right to abort another human being with the inestimable value of God’s image, does not start with her freedom of choice, it starts with God (as does everything).
When we apply the foundational truth that human beings bear the image of God, bare his glory, value, purpose AND are specifically made through the Son of God, by the Son of God and FOR the Son of God (“All things were made through Him, and ALL things were made unto Him” – Colossians 1:16-17), then women should not be allowed to abort children, slave owners should not be able to own, rape, brutalize and murder slaves as though they were mere chattel, children should not be allowed drugs that stop the natural progression of their bodies growing into men and women, and they should not be afforded surgeries where their God given body parts, made in God’s image and for His glory, are cut up and cut off in the name of human choice; and no, human beings should not be allowed to engage in so called same-sex marriage.
This professed Christian should know and see this truth, but he does not. The reason he does not, is because he does not know, love, and submit to the scriptures or the God of them. His worldview is not Christocentric (meaning, it is not centered on Christ).
If you open one door, you must open all the doors and you do not have a standard to close any of them once they are open.
Lord Jesus, please help us poor, blind sinners see you, love you, honor and obey you.